Two miscarriage suppliers in Indiana Taking the release of individual reports from the end of pregnancy took the case to court, submitting a lawsuit in Marion to maintain the privacy of registers.
Licensed Ob-Gyn Caitlin Bernard and Caroline Rouse have filed a lawsuit to prevent the Indiana Health Department before issuing documents related to completed pregnancies on the basis of the Act on access to Indiana public documentation, stating that such entries are exempt and do not have to be disclosed, Inside Indiana Business Reported.
If they are published, the reports will not disclose the names of patients who have completed the pregnancy, but would contain other personal data, such as age, breed and the county of residence. Reports also contain the name of the doctor who conducted an abortion.
“Once again, we are in court, defending our patients and their rights to privacy,” said Bernard and Rouse in a joint statement, as reported Hill
“Everyone who receives medical care deserves to protect personal health decisions and pregnancy results. There is no reason to publicly share this sensitive information. We will fight to protect the privacy of patients and trust between doctors and patients, “they continued that they continued.
Bernard drew attention to the national attention after he spoke about the patient who helped to receive abortion in 2022: 10-year-old A girl from Ohio which was supposedly sexually attacked.
The Department of Health Indiana ceased to release individual reports of ended pregnancies after the implementation of an almost total ban on abortion, continuing only the release of aggregated reports about ended pregnancies in the state.
From July to September 2023, IDOH reported 764 abortions. Only 17 of them were carried out after August, when abortion bans were in force. Then the agency dealt with fears that the identification of reports could be “reverse engineering” in order to identify patients who have completed pregnancy because of a small number of abortion carried out in this state.
“Considering that the report is filled with information that can be reversed to identify patients – especially in smaller communities – (argues IDOH) that the required quarterly reports should be enough in terms of meeting all considerations regarding disclosure and transparency”, December informal opinion Luke Britt said from a public adviser.
Pro-life vovocacy Grouse for Life will continue to allow Indiana, demanding the publication of individual reports. Votes for life stated that he would appeal after the case by the judge of the Fairy Farion in 2024. However, in January 2025, the newly elected Republican Governor of Indiana, Mike Braun, demanded to publish reports on the basis of an executive order.
Idoh, who decided and agreed to publish the provisions, stated that they would make the editorial staff to reports that “they properly protect personal health identifiers and that they do not inhibit the examination of the completed pregnancy reports in order to determine whether the doctor had an abortion in accordance with Indiana Law.” Indiana Capitol Chronicle.
The court has not yet established a hearing regarding the claim presented by Bernard and Rouse.